Commentary for Bava Batra 185:10

ת"ש המוכר פירות לחברו וזרען ולא צמחו ואפי' זרע פשתן אינו חייב באחריותן

is of the same opinion as R. Aha<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who attributes the killing to the 'covering' camel because of its legal status (legally regarded as ferocious and likely to kill). ');">¹⁸</span> and Samuel<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who disregards the majority principle in monetary matters. ');">¹⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Batra 185:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.